A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights in the parties, arising out in the over marriage on the few, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Case legislation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified via the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on get more info this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in assist of your Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. Read more
A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name on the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
In a few jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Unlike most civil law systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.